Valentine's Day is for Suckers, Not Romantics
As the rain pelted sideways on the weekend, I stooped to throw a bouquet of roses into my grocery cart. An attempt to cheer up our joint on the darkest of winter days, add a little sunshine into the mix, mask the stale aroma of February. But I was horrified when I noticed the normal $14.99 price tag had been jacked up to $29.99, courtesy of my least favorite Hallmark-induced holiday, Valentine's Day.
I was prepared to leave this one alone this week, to let bloggers and columnists wage their own wars with cupid, falling either in the pro or con category. If I were to predictably fall into the con category, you might think I am a washed up cynic, jaded by fifteen years of marriage, any romantic spark long since replaced by everyday realities.
And you would be right.
My image on the line, I'm still prepared to go down this route to exploit the flower industry as the crooks that they are. Forget Hallmark, who at the very least can't double the printed cost of their red and pink cards as February 14 rolls closer, the florists of this world are the biggest benefactors of this artificial holiday. I'm disgusted with the injustice of jacking up their cost of arrangements to double their normal price tag.
The last thing I have ever wanted for Valentine's Day is flowers (honey, are you reading this?). I have long been a proponent of the "give me flowers any other day of the year instead, when they are half the cost" club. I cannot relate to all of those tweets and stories I'm reading about women who just want flowers for Valentine's Day - "would that kill him"? What is romantic about receiving flowers on the day some marketer has deemed it romantic to receive flowers? Our collective lack of imagination has too many people resorting to being sheep, with the florists of the world being the lucky benefactors.Continued on the next page