88 blog reactions to http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/jonathan_david_farley/2008/03/wright_was_right.html

E' la tesi di Jonathan Farley che avevamo segnalato ieri. Si riferisce alle parole del reverendo Wright, radicali e anti-establishment, con le quali attacca la cultura dei bianchi americani e quella dei rappresentanti delle minoranze che si fanno assimilare. Nell'articolo di Farley

I can well understand that the black folk memory of America is hugely different to the white version but is this what black people really think? Is that what they were thinking five days after 9/11?So he knows it's there but doesn't understand why? Which American history did he study? This ignorance is blatant and pathetic from someone paid a lot by our lead broadcaster to cover America. Matt Frei cherry-picked his media reaction, the GOP's meme about Rev. Wright: He did not denounce the man, "who has been like family

s own profoundly distorted view may be a necessary ruse for winning an election, but there is hardly anything controversial in what Rev. Wright says. Jonathan David Farley agrees. ‘Barack Obama was quick to condemn his former pastor’s comments,’ writes Farley, ‘but most black Americans agree with them’.

s own profoundly distorted view may be a necessary ruse for winning an election, but there is hardly anything controversial in what Rev. Wright says. Jonathan David Farley agrees. ‘Barack Obama was quick to condemn his former pastor’s comments,’ writes Farley, ‘but most black Americans agree with them’.

(490) commentsIsrael needs change, too (312) commentsGray's elegy (273) commentsJihad or alcohol? (237) commentsLucky Heather? (231) commentsImperfect union (223) commentsPrecious liberty (191) commentsWright was right (189) commentsLondon's election holds the future for progressive politics, not just Ken (165) commentsMoral hazard (138) comments

(490) commentsIsrael needs change, too (312) commentsGray's elegy (273) commentsJihad or alcohol? (237) commentsLucky Heather? (231) commentsImperfect union (223) commentsPrecious liberty (191) commentsWright was right (189) commentsLondon's election holds the future for progressive politics, not just Ken (165) commentsMoral hazard (138) comments

(490) commentsIsrael needs change, too (312) commentsGray's elegy (273) commentsJihad or alcohol? (237) commentsLucky Heather? (231) commentsImperfect union (223) commentsPrecious liberty (191) commentsWright was right (189) commentsLondon's election holds the future for progressive politics, not just Ken (165) commentsMoral hazard (138) comments

(488) commentsIsrael needs change, too (311) commentsGray's elegy (271) commentsJihad or alcohol? (237) commentsLucky Heather? (228) commentsImperfect union (220) commentsPrecious liberty (191) commentsWright was right (189) commentsLondon's election holds the future for progressive politics, not just Ken (161) commentsCameron's down-home hokum is going to backfire (138) comments

(488) commentsIsrael needs change, too (311) commentsGray's elegy (271) commentsJihad or alcohol? (237) commentsLucky Heather? (228) commentsImperfect union (220) commentsPrecious liberty (191) commentsWright was right (189) commentsLondon's election holds the future for progressive politics, not just Ken (161) commentsCameron's down-home hokum is going to backfire (138) comments

(488) commentsIsrael needs change, too (311) commentsGray's elegy (271) commentsJihad or alcohol? (237) commentsLucky Heather? (228) commentsImperfect union (220) commentsPrecious liberty (191) commentsWright was right (189) commentsLondon's election holds the future for progressive politics, not just Ken (161) commentsCameron's down-home hokum is going to backfire (138) comments