Blogs / U.S. Copyright Office

No authority yet Info
Rank: 4,647,702

U.S. Copyright OfficeView thumbnail

View all »

3,158 blog reactions

  1. Author unknown

    The Illustrators Partnership Orphan Works Blog

    http://ipaorphanworks.blogspot.com

    http://www.loc.gov/today/pr/2005/05-250.html [4] <#_ftnref4> http://www.brandaideblog.com/pdf/Position_Statement.pdf [5] <#_ftnref5> http://investor.google.com/documents/20070331_10-Q.html [6] <#_ftnref6> http://www.copyright.gov/docs/regstat031308.html [7] <#_ftnref7> http://videos.cmitnyc.com/asip.html [8] <#_ftnref8> http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1263361

  2. Author unknown

    Photo Attorney

    http://www.photoattorney.com

    copyright owner of the work, including the information set forth in a notice of copyright. . . . (6) Terms and conditions for use of the work. (7) Identifying numbers or symbols referring to such information or links to such information. . . . See 17 USC 1202(c). You can put your copyright management information in the metadata of your photos or as a watermark (as shown in the bottom left corner of my photo above). See my May 7, 2008, blog to learn how to add metadata to your photos. Sometimes, however,

    7 hours ago in Photo Attorney · Authority: 143
  3. Photo of EscritoresClub

    MEDITACIÓN

    http://www.escritoresclub.com/2008/10/meditacin.html

    © 2008 Standard Copyright License

  4. Author unknown

    It's DMCA exemption time!

    http://www.contentagenda.com/blog/1500000150/post/640034464....

    1201(a)(1) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, in which the Register of Copyrights makes recommendations to the Librarian of Congress about granting temporary exemptions to the ban on circumventing encryption on certain classes of works. The federal register notice is here. Congress added the triennial review to...

  5. Author unknown

    The Right to Duplicate Digital Media

    http://techsidestories.com/2008/10/06/the-right-to-duplicate...

    ’ and the answer is right there. It’s not a secret; it’s right there. All the information that’s been donated by everyday users that believe in the right to copy your own media- referencing the Audio Home Recording Act of 1992. This Act states that it is perfectly legal to copy a media source the you have purchased for the purpose of a backup or replacement copy. Currently, the studios and manufacturers are making their DVDs and

  6. Author unknown

    Monday At The Beach

    http://www.ccmr.tv/news/?p=774

    Copyright: © 2008 CCMR Ministries Standard Copyright License

    1 day ago in CCMR TV News · Authority: 1
  7. Author unknown

    Media Wonk - Blog on ContentAgenda.com - 1500000150

    http://www.contentagenda.com/blog/1500000150.html

    1201(a)(1) of the Digital Millennium Copyright Act, in which the Register of Copyrights makes recommendations to the Librarian of Congress about granting temporary exemptions to the ban on circumventing encryption on certain classes of works. The federal register notice is here. Congress added the triennial review to the DMCA as a fail-safe mechanism, in case it turned out that the blanket ban on circumvention was "unduly burdening" fair use of certain types of work. The exemptions are only good for three years, however, and

  8. Author unknown

    Zwartbaard

    http://www.zwartbaard.nl/weblog

    one point he states that the fine is “$250,000 per infraction” which is a complete lie. As regular readers and followers of US copyright infringement cases know, the maximum damages that can be awarded per infraction is $150,000 not $250,000 (USC Title 17, § 504 (c)(2)). The most they have managed to get in these cases is $9,250, but even that turned out to be too much. Of greatest worry was his position on the details of students. Fulkerson has said that when/if the RIAA asks for names and details that correspond

    1 day ago in Zwartbaard · Authority: 2
  9. Author unknown

    Tackling Campus Piracy with FUD

    http://www.zwartbaard.nl/weblog/2008/10/06/tackling-campus-p...

    At one point he states that the fine is “$250,000 per infraction” which is a complete lie. As regular readers and followers of US copyright infringement cases know, the maximum damages that can be awarded per infraction is $150,000 not $250,000 (USC Title 17, § 504 (c)(2)). The most they have managed to get in these cases is $9,250, but even that turned out to be too much. Of greatest worry was his position on the details of students. Fulkerson has said that when/if the RIAA asks for names and details that correspond

    1 day ago in Zwartbaard · Authority: 2
  10. Author unknown

    Google pays Library of Congress  $3 MILLION for Orphan Works Legislation

    http://blog.absolutearts.com/blogs/archives/00000461.html

    [to claim authorship] and it will be extremely inefficient for us." (Italics added.) -page 166 (Page numbers are from Copyright Office transcripts.) Orphan Works Roundtables were held by the US Copyright Office July 26-7, 2005 in Washington DC www.copyright.gov/orphan/transcript/0726LOC.PDF 4. Google Donates $3 Million to U.S. Library of Congress Australian IT Nov 23, 2005 -- The U.S. Library of Congress is kicking off a campaign to work with other nation's libraries to build a World Digital Library, starting with a $US3 million

View all »

1 fan

Members who favorited this blog