Blogs / ConsortiumInfo.org - Please Welcome Digistan

View all »

Latest posts

  1. China Slams Nokia for Standards Based "Pride and Prejudice"

    http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080514054810685

    I'm hardly a veteran "China Watcher" in the State Department sense of these words, but I have had a Google alert in place for three or four years to snag standards-related news emerging from this most powerful of emerging economies. This has led me to read a great many articles from the Xinhua state news service over that period of time. …

    144 days ago
  2. Introducing The Hague Declaration

    http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080512141838422

    When one thinks of international human rights, one thinks of The Hague - home of the International Court of Justice and the International Criminal Court, and the situs of an increasing number of Tribunals chartered to redress the assaults on human dignity that inexcusably continue to plague this planet. …

    144 days ago
  3. Rambus Ruling Overturned: A Legal Dispute of Dickensian Proportions Lurches On

    http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080424070734344

    The one great principle of the English law is, to make business for itself. There is no other principle distinctly, certainly, and consistently maintained through all its narrow turnings. Charles Dickens, Bleak House According to John the Apostle, the poor will be always with us. …

    144 days ago
View all »

6 blog reactions

  1. Photo of MonBillet

    Déclaration de La Haye pour les standards numériques libres et ouverts

    http://monbillet.wordpress.com/2008/07/27/declaration-de-la-...

    http://www.digistan.org/hague-declaration:fr Trouvé l’information au sujet de la déclaration sur Le Panoptique. Plus d’information sur la Digital Standard Organisation, responsable de la déclaration ici

    72 days ago in MON BILLET by MonBillet · Authority: 12
  2. Author unknown

    Linux Foundation Legal

    http://linux-foundation.org/weblogs/legal

    4. Help standards authorities understand, qualify, and enforce open standards. 5. Defend the open standards community, small and large, against capture by vendors. Digistan is active in, and welcomes active support, in all these areas. Read the rest of this post Popularity: 69% [?]

  3. Author unknown

    Please Welcome Digistan

    http://linux-foundation.org/weblogs/legal/2008/05/20/please-...

    4. Help standards authorities understand, qualify, and enforce open standards. 5. Defend the open standards community, small and large, against capture by vendors. Digistan is active in, and welcomes active support, in all these areas. Read the rest of this post

  4. Photo of glynmoody

    A Blog Rant from Absurdistan

    http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2008/05/blog-rant-from-abs...

    . At the very least it might provoke another entertaining blog rant from Absurdistan. Update: Here's some another pinko Euro (who happens to vote Conservative), while Andy Updegrove himself offers some calm words of wisdom.

    143 days ago in open... by glynmoody · Authority: 87
  5. Author unknown

    OpenOffice.org Ninja

    http://www.oooninja.com

    Please Welcome Digistan Dreamy Dreamlinux Setting the Record Straight on OOXML and Silverblight [sic] Sumitomo Corp Adopts OpenOffice Table and table-text flow control features for OpenOffice Writer

  6. Author unknown

    26 new messages in 16 topics - digest

    http://java-errors.blogspot.com/2008/05/26-new-messages-in-1...

    | the Digital Standards Organization (Digistan, for short), and I'm pleased to | say that I am one of its founders. In this entry, I'll give you my | perceptions of what Digistan is all about, and what I hope it will | accomplish. `---- http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080515060701633 Related: Here is how Ireland voted in September: Ireland Votes No with Comments ,----[ Quote ] | After months of intensive review, analysis and discussion, NSAI has voted | Disapproval - with Technical Comments, in respect of the OOXML submission.

    144 days ago in JAVA ERRORS · Authority: 10